Trojan vs BonkBot

Quick winner by use case

If you want copy trading and wallet tracking built into your Telegram bot, Trojan confirms both as features while BonkBot lists copy trading and wallet tracking as Not publicly confirmed. If you want the simplest possible entry point into Solana trading from Telegram and are not looking for analytics, BonkBot's narrower, more basic feature set and slightly lower rated ease of setup make it a reasonable starting point, particularly for a first-time bot user.

Fee comparison with a worked example

Trojan publishes a 0.9% trading fee; BonkBot publishes a 1% trading fee. On a 1,000 USD swap, that is roughly 9 USD in platform fees on Trojan versus roughly 10 USD on BonkBot, before network and priority fees, which apply to both and vary with Solana congestion. The gap is a single USD on this example size, so it will only matter meaningfully to traders running larger size or higher frequency through one bot or the other. Both platforms advertise referral discounts, though tiers are not specified for either.

Chains and devices

Both are Solana-only and delivered exclusively through Telegram, with web and mobile availability Not publicly confirmed for either. This is one of the more like-for-like comparisons in this set on the device and chain axis: neither bot gives you a reason to switch based on coverage, since both cover exactly one chain through exactly one interface.

Custody

Both use a non-custodial bot wallet with key export, which is the standard and expected model for a Telegram trading bot. Neither has publicly confirmed audit documentation. Because both operate entirely inside Telegram, the practical security consideration is the same for both: the Telegram account itself becomes the single point of failure, so enabling Telegram's own two-factor authentication matters as much as, or more than, any feature difference between the two bots.

Copy trading

Trojan confirms copy trading as a feature. BonkBot's copy trading support is Not publicly confirmed, which our data also flags as a listed con: BonkBot is not the tool for traders who need copy trading or deep analytics. If mirroring another wallet's trades is part of your strategy, Trojan is the documented choice between the two; BonkBot would require direct verification of current functionality before you could rely on it for that purpose.

Execution controls

Both confirm limit orders and MEV protection, so on pure execution mechanics they are closely matched. Trojan additionally confirms wallet tracking, which BonkBot does not. In practice this means Trojan gives you more information to act on inside the same chat interface, while BonkBot keeps the command set intentionally minimal, which our data describes as limited analytics as a trade-off for that simplicity.

Beginner vs advanced

Both are rated beginner friendly, and both share the general Telegram-bot advantage of not requiring a separate app or browser tab. BonkBot is explicitly positioned in our data as the simplest entry point in the bot category, with very few steps between opening the chat and placing a swap. Trojan is also accessible to newcomers but carries slightly more surface area, given its added copy trading and wallet tracking features, so a first trade on Trojan involves marginally more to learn than a first trade on BonkBot.

Reasons to choose Trojan

• You want confirmed copy trading and wallet tracking inside Telegram
• You want the slightly lower published fee (0.9% versus 1%)
• You want more on-chain context without leaving the chat interface

Reasons to choose BonkBot

• You want the simplest possible command set for fast Solana swaps
• You do not need copy trading or wallet analytics
• You want to minimise the number of features you have to learn before your first trade

Final decision table

Reading the fee line on your confirmation screen

Both bots quote their fee inline in the Telegram chat itself, as part of the confirmation message you approve before a swap executes, rather than on a separate web page. Trojan's message reflects its 0.9% published rate and BonkBot's reflects its 1% rate, with Solana network and priority fees added on top in both cases and not itemised as a separate line the way a web terminal's swap panel might show them. Neither bot's documentation states whether the platform fee is taken from the input or output amount, so a trader running larger size through either bot should compare the amount sent against the amount confirmed as received on a modest trade first.

On a 100 USD swap, Trojan's fee is 0.90 USD and BonkBot's is 1.00 USD, a difference of ten cents that is irrelevant at that size next to typical priority-fee variance. On a 25,000 USD swap, Trojan's fee is 225 USD and BonkBot's is 250 USD, a 25 USD gap that becomes worth noticing for anyone running that kind of size repeatedly through a Telegram bot rather than a web terminal.

Migration and switching cost

Switching between Trojan and BonkBot is lower-friction than most pairings in this category because both operate entirely inside Telegram with a non-custodial wallet and key export: a trader can export the private key from one bot's wallet, import it or fund a fresh wallet in the other bot's chat, and be trading within the other tool in a few messages. What does not transfer automatically is any wallet-tracking list built up in Trojan, since BonkBot does not confirm that feature and has nowhere to receive it.

Because both bots share the same Solana-only, Telegram-only footprint, there is no chain or device adjustment to make in either direction, which is unusual in this comparison set — the switching cost here is almost entirely about which feature set, not which platform surface, you want to keep using.

What each platform does not do

BonkBot does not confirm copy trading or wallet tracking, so a trader who wants to mirror another address or watch its activity from inside the bot has no documented way to do that on BonkBot and would need Trojan or a separate tool for that purpose. Neither bot offers a web or mobile interface, a chart, or perpetual markets — both are chat-only, spot-only tools by design, and neither is a substitute for a full terminal if you need on-screen charting while you trade.

Neither publishes independent audit documentation, and in both cases a limit order is only a standing instruction to trade at a chosen price once the market reaches it, not a guarantee that a fill will happen at that exact price on a thinly traded token.

Common mistakes on this pairing

• Choosing BonkBot expecting copy trading or wallet tracking to be available, when both are Not publicly confirmed for that bot
• Treating the 0.9% versus 1% fee gap as decisive at small trade sizes, where priority-fee variance usually matters more
• Skipping Telegram two-factor authentication on either bot, which is the main practical safeguard for a chat-based, non-custodial wallet
• Assuming a feature confirmed on Trojan is also present on BonkBot simply because both are Solana Telegram bots with a similar command style