Editorial policy

Independence

Rankings follow the published methodology. No platform can buy a position, a score or a favourable verdict. Affiliate partners and non-partners are held to the same evidence standard, and platforms with no commercial relationship appear throughout the site.

Sourcing

• Primary sources first: official sites, official docs, official announcements.
• On-chain data where a program, router or contract can be identified.
• Third-party estimates are labelled as estimates, with the period and a source link.
• Every material factual claim carries a visible source or a “Not publicly confirmed” marker.

Writing standards

All content is original. We do not copy sentences from platform marketing pages or other publications. We avoid promotional language, profit promises and unsupported superlatives. Reviews state who a platform is not suitable for as clearly as who it suits.

Updates and corrections

Every review carries a last-verified date and a change history. When a platform changes fees, custody model or feature set, we update the dataset and log the change. Errors are corrected publicly on the corrections page.

Conflicts of interest

Contributors must disclose any holding, advisory role or paid relationship connected to a platform they cover. Where a conflict cannot be avoided, the coverage is reassigned.

Risk statement

Nothing published here is financial advice. On-chain trading can lose the full value of your position, and non-custodial tools transfer key-management risk to you.