Genius review
Automation-focused terminal
Written by TraderView Research Desk · Reviewed by TraderView Editorial Review
·
Last verified
TraderView may earn a commission when you use some links. This does not affect our rankings or editorial conclusions. Affiliate disclosure.
Quick verdict
Affiliate disclosure. We may earn a commission when you use some links on this page. This does not increase your trading fee unless explicitly stated. Rankings are based on our published methodology. Read more.
Key facts
The verified summary of Genius, in the same shape on every review.
| Platform | Genius |
|---|---|
| Type | Web trading terminal |
| Editorial score | 7.0 out of 10 |
| Published fee | Not publicly confirmed |
| Supported chains | Solana, Ethereum, Base |
| Custody | Non-custodial in-app wallet |
| KYC | No KYC |
| Interfaces | Web, Telegram |
| Best for | Automation-focused terminal |
| Last verified | 2026-08-28 |
Who it is best for
Genius suits traders who value automation-focused terminal. Automation and preset-driven execution, and the workflow rewards people who trade often enough to justify the published platform fee.
Who should avoid it
Casual traders who will not use automation features.
Features we checked
- Platform type
- Web trading terminal
- Supported chains
- Solana, Ethereum, Base
- Web
- Yes
- Mobile
- Not publicly confirmed
- Telegram
- Yes
- Spot trading
- Yes
- Perpetuals
- Not publicly confirmed
- Copy trading
- Yes
- Wallet tracking
- Yes
- Limit orders
- Yes
- MEV protection
- Not publicly confirmed
- KYC
- No KYC
Fees, with a worked example
Published fee: Not publicly confirmed. Referral terms: Not publicly confirmed.
Genius does not publish a fee schedule we could verify, so we show “Not publicly confirmed” rather than estimating. Check the in-app confirmation screen before your first trade.
Security and custody
Custody model: Non-custodial in-app wallet.
Non-custodial wallet model; automated strategies can execute mistakes quickly at scale.
Known incidents or controversies
No confirmed platform-level exploit found at last verification.
A high security score is never awarded on the basis of a platform's own marketing claims. See our methodology.
Advantages
- + Automation and preset-driven execution
- + Multi-chain coverage
- + Copy trading included
Limitations
- − Published fee schedule is Not publicly confirmed
- − Smaller community than top-ranked rivals
- − Automation requires careful configuration
Alternatives to Genius
- Axiom
Best overall on-chain terminal
Compare Genius vs Axiom - GMGN
Best for smart-money and wallet tracking
Compare Genius vs GMGN - Fomo
Best social trading app and fastest-growing candidate
Compare Genius vs Fomo
How Genius compares
Showing 4 platforms. Values marked “Not publicly confirmed” could not be verified from an official source at the last check.
| Platform | Best for | Chains | Web | Mobile | Telegram | Spot | Perps | Copy | Wallet tracking | Limit orders | MEV protection | Published base fee | Referral discount | Custody | KYC | Last verified | Score | Go |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axiom | Best overall on-chain terminal | Solana, Hyperliquid (perps) | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 1% published trading fee | Referral fee discounts advertised; exact tiers vary | Non-custodial trading wallet generated in-app; user holds the keys | No KYC for on-chain trading | 2026-08-28 | 8.4 | Get 10% Fee Discount |
| GMGN | Best for smart-money and wallet tracking | Solana, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Tron | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 1% published trading fee | Referral programme advertised; discount tiers vary | Non-custodial in-app wallet; private key export available | No KYC | 2026-08-28 | 8.3 | Trade on GMGN |
| Fomo | Best social trading app and fastest-growing candidate | Solana, Robinhood Chain, BNB Chain, Base, Ethereum, Monad | Yes | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Non-custodial in-app wallet | No KYC | 2026-08-28 | 7.4 | Trade on Fomo |
| Genius | Automation-focused terminal | Solana, Ethereum, Base | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Yes | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Non-custodial in-app wallet | No KYC | 2026-08-28 | 7.0 | Visit Official Site |
Final verdict
Genius scores 7.0/10 on our weighted formula. It earns its place for automation-focused terminal, but published fee schedule is not publicly confirmed is a real constraint. Nothing here implies that trading on Genius is safe or profitable; on-chain trading can lose the full value of your position.
Score breakdown
| Component | Weight | Score | Score bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Popularity and verifiable usage | 20% | 6.2 | |
| Fees and value | 20% | 6.5 | |
| Trading and analytics features | 20% | 8.0 | |
| Security transparency and custody | 20% | 6.8 | |
| User experience | 10% | 7.2 | |
| Chain and device coverage | 10% | 8.0 |
FAQs
Who is Genius for?
Traders who want rule-based automation rather than fully manual execution.
Sources
- Source: Genius official site
About the author
The TraderView research desk compiles platform data from official documentation, app store listings and public fee schedules, and records every claim against a dated source. Where a platform does not publish a figure, the desk publishes 'Not publicly confirmed' rather than an estimate.
Editorial review checks every published page against the scoring methodology, verifies that outbound destinations match the link registry, and confirms that affiliate relationships are disclosed before the page goes live.
Change history and corrections
- — Initial editorial review published.
Spotted an error? Submit a correction.
Genius
Not publicly confirmed