Maestro review
Long-running multi-chain bot
Written by TraderView Research Desk · Reviewed by TraderView Editorial Review
·
Last verified
TraderView may earn a commission when you use some links. This does not affect our rankings or editorial conclusions. Affiliate disclosure.
Quick verdict
Affiliate disclosure. We may earn a commission when you use some links on this page. This does not increase your trading fee unless explicitly stated. Rankings are based on our published methodology. Read more.
Key facts
The verified summary of Maestro, in the same shape on every review.
| Platform | Maestro |
|---|---|
| Type | Telegram bot |
| Editorial score | 7.4 out of 10 |
| Published fee | 1% published trading fee |
| Supported chains | Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Solana, Arbitrum |
| Custody | Non-custodial bot wallet |
| KYC | No KYC |
| Interfaces | Telegram |
| Best for | Long-running multi-chain bot |
| Last verified | 2026-08-28 |
Who it is best for
Maestro suits traders who value long-running multi-chain bot. Wide chain coverage, and the workflow rewards people who trade often enough to justify the published platform fee.
Who should avoid it
Traders who want a visual terminal.
Features we checked
- Platform type
- Telegram bot
- Supported chains
- Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Solana, Arbitrum
- Web
- Not publicly confirmed
- Mobile
- Not publicly confirmed
- Telegram
- Yes
- Spot trading
- Yes
- Perpetuals
- No
- Copy trading
- Yes
- Wallet tracking
- Yes
- Limit orders
- Yes
- MEV protection
- Yes
- KYC
- No KYC
Fees, with a worked example
Published fee: 1% published trading fee. Referral terms: Referral programme advertised.
On $10,000 of round-trip volume — say twenty buys and twenty sells averaging $250 each — the platform fee alone is about $100. Network and priority fees on Solana typically add a few cents to a few dollars per transaction, and slippage on thin pairs regularly costs more than every other line combined.
Security and custody
Custody model: Non-custodial bot wallet.
A 2023 router exploit was publicly reported and the team stated affected users were compensated. Treat as reported history.
Known incidents or controversies
2023 router exploit publicly reported; reimbursement stated by the team.
A high security score is never awarded on the basis of a platform's own marketing claims. See our methodology.
Advantages
- + Wide chain coverage
- + Long operating history
- + Copy trading and call channels
Limitations
- − Telegram only
- − Premium tiers add subscription cost
- − Interface complexity
Alternatives to Maestro
- Axiom
Best overall on-chain terminal
Compare Maestro vs Axiom - GMGN
Best for smart-money and wallet tracking
Compare Maestro vs GMGN - Fomo
Best social trading app and fastest-growing candidate
Compare Maestro vs Fomo
How Maestro compares
Showing 4 platforms. Values marked “Not publicly confirmed” could not be verified from an official source at the last check.
| Platform | Best for | Chains | Web | Mobile | Telegram | Spot | Perps | Copy | Wallet tracking | Limit orders | MEV protection | Published base fee | Referral discount | Custody | KYC | Last verified | Score | Go |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axiom | Best overall on-chain terminal | Solana, Hyperliquid (perps) | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 1% published trading fee | Referral fee discounts advertised; exact tiers vary | Non-custodial trading wallet generated in-app; user holds the keys | No KYC for on-chain trading | 2026-08-28 | 8.4 | Get 10% Fee Discount |
| GMGN | Best for smart-money and wallet tracking | Solana, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Tron | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 1% published trading fee | Referral programme advertised; discount tiers vary | Non-custodial in-app wallet; private key export available | No KYC | 2026-08-28 | 8.3 | Trade on GMGN |
| Fomo | Best social trading app and fastest-growing candidate | Solana, Robinhood Chain, BNB Chain, Base, Ethereum, Monad | Yes | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Non-custodial in-app wallet | No KYC | 2026-08-28 | 7.4 | Trade on Fomo |
| Maestro | Long-running multi-chain bot | Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Solana, Arbitrum | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 1% published trading fee | Referral programme advertised | Non-custodial bot wallet | No KYC | 2026-08-28 | 7.4 | Visit Official Site |
Final verdict
Maestro scores 7.4/10 on our weighted formula. It earns its place for long-running multi-chain bot, but telegram only is a real constraint. Nothing here implies that trading on Maestro is safe or profitable; on-chain trading can lose the full value of your position.
Score breakdown
| Component | Weight | Score | Score bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Popularity and verifiable usage | 20% | 7.2 | |
| Fees and value | 20% | 7.5 | |
| Trading and analytics features | 20% | 7.8 | |
| Security transparency and custody | 20% | 6.4 | |
| User experience | 10% | 6.8 | |
| Chain and device coverage | 10% | 9.0 |
FAQs
Does Maestro charge a subscription?
Premium tiers are advertised alongside per-trade fees.
Sources
- Source: Maestro official site
About the author
The TraderView research desk compiles platform data from official documentation, app store listings and public fee schedules, and records every claim against a dated source. Where a platform does not publish a figure, the desk publishes 'Not publicly confirmed' rather than an estimate.
Editorial review checks every published page against the scoring methodology, verifies that outbound destinations match the link registry, and confirms that affiliate relationships are disclosed before the page goes live.
Change history and corrections
- — Initial listing published.
Spotted an error? Submit a correction.
Maestro
1% published trading fee